Are scientists any good at judging the importance of the scientific work of others? According to a study published 8 October in the open access journal PLOS Biology (with an accompanying editorial), scientists are unreliable judges of the importance of fellow researchers' published papers. The article's lead author, Professor Adam Eyre-Walker of the University of Sussex, says: "Scientists are probably the best judges of science, but they are pretty bad at it." Prof...
-
Source: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/266916.php
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
09 Oct, 2013
-
Source: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/266916.php
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
Post a Comment